Against Nonmonotonic Logic (DRAFT)

نویسنده

  • Michael J. O’Donnell
چکیده

The monotonicity property of inference in conventional formal systems of logic (S ` A and S ⊆ T implies T ` A) appears to prohibit certain crucial steps in practical intuitive reasoning. For example, reasoning by default (using assertions that are assumed to hold until explicitly contradicted) appears to be impossible in monotonic systems. Many crucial steps in practical reasoning certainly require nonmonotonic behaviors in inference procedures. But, I argue that it is highly misleading to describe these nonmonotonic behaviors in terms of nonmonotonic inference relations `. Rather, inference procedures should use metatheoretic operators, with conventionally monotonic inference relations, to support nonmonotonic behavior. 1 Defeasible Reasoning Requires Nonmono-

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Sequent Calculus for a Paraconsistent Nonmonotonic Logic ?

In spite of sequent calculus being an appealing tool for describing logical systems, its use along with nonmonotonic logics has been largely neglected. Reasons may be the hardness in implementing a context sensitive mechanism able to detect changes in the theory. This seems to brake the locality of context of sequent rules. Nevertheless, a nonmo-notonic sequent calculus may be helpful if result...

متن کامل

An S4F-related Monotonic Modal Logic

This paper introduces a novel monotonic modal logic, allowing us to capture the nonmonotonic variant of the modal logic S4F: we add a second new modal operator into the original language of S4F, and show that the resulting formalism is strong enough to characterise the logical consequence of (nonmonotonic) S4F, as well as its minimal model semantics. The latter underlies major forms of nonmonot...

متن کامل

Towards First-Order Nonmonotonic Reasoning

We investigate the problem of reasoning in nonmonotonic extensions of rst-order logic. In particular, we study reasoning in rst-order MKNF, the modal logic of minimal knowledge and negation as failure introduced by Lifschitz. MKNF can be considered as a unifying framework for several nonmonotonic formalisms, including default logic, autoepistemic logic, circumscription, and logic programming. B...

متن کامل

Two-Valued Logic Programs

We define a nonmonotonic formalism that shares some features with three other systems of nonmonotonic reasoning—default logic, logic programming with strong negation, and nonmonotonic causal logic—and study its possibilities as a language for describing actions. 1998 ACM Subject Classification D.1.6 Logic Programming

متن کامل

Nonmonotonic Skeptical Consequence Relation in Constrained Default Logic

This paper presents a study of the nonmonotonic consequence relation which models the skeptical reasoning formalised by constrained default logic. The nonmonotonic skeptical consequence relation is defined using the sequent calculus axiomatic system. We study the formal properties desirable for a “good” nonmonotonic relation: supraclassicality, cut, cautious monotony, cumulativity, absorption, ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001